top of page

Not on My Turf



In early April, the City Council heard a presentation by Lage Design about staff’s

recommended option to remove 35% of the turf at the Boulder City Municipal Golf Course.

Two weeks later, residents attended a town hall meeting at the clubhouse where many felt their

concerns and objections weren’t being heard. Although Council hasn’t officially approved this

option or its final design, many left feeling like it’s already a done deal, with staff just going

through the motions in mock public outreach efforts.


Why even consider removing so much turf? Well, in 2021, Governor Sisolak signed

AB356, the Legislature’s mandate to remove all nonfunctional turf by the end of 2026 and

making it illegal thereafter to irrigate nonfunctional grass with Colorado River water. That

mandate followed a 20-plus year drought that saw Lake Mead drop over 170 feet and resulted in

the first-ever emergency shortage declaration by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the lower

Colorado River Basin.


Even though we’ve had a few relatively wet years since 2021, nobody in their right mind

questions the drought or the dire straits we could be facing if it continues. In furtherance of the

shortage declaration, the federal government reduced southern Nevada’s river water allocation by

billions of gallons annually, and the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) began further

incentivizing municipalities like Boulder City to contribute their fair share to conservation

efforts.


In August 2022, the City Council adopted ordinance changes designed to increase water

conservation, including limiting the size of new swimming pools, restricting man-made lakes and

water features, imposing potential penalties against non-compliant water wasters, upgrading

efficiency of the city’s irrigation systems, and removing grass from city parks and golf courses.

At that point, however, Council only approved removal of 16.5 acres of grass at the Muni

Course. Now the recommendation is to remove three times that much, a whopping 46.5 acres or

over 2 million square feet of turf.


AB356’s definition of nonfunctional turf referred largely to grass within 10 feet of streets

and decorative turf around non-residential buildings. But the grass being slated for removal from

the Muni Course is just the opposite–right next to residential homes and mostly far away from

streets. And it’s not just a 5- or 10- foot buffer to keep water off the residential walls that’s being

recommended by staff. In some locations, the swaths of desert and xeriscape that will be left

where cool turf once was are dozens if not scores of feet wide.


The million or two in rebates from SNWA is a nice incentive to remove turf. But in the

big picture, that won’t make a dent in the city’s coffers. And what is the city spending that rebate

money on anyway?


More to the point, though, it seems like we’re not being very wise in our selection of nonfunctional turf to remove. In fact, in the case of the proposed Muni Course turf removal plan,

it’s highly questionable whether that turf even meets the law’s definition of “nonfunctional.”

Instead of doing the extra work required to identify and remove truly nonfunctional turf found in

pockets around the city, it feels like we’re just taking the easy way out by removing golf course

turf because there’s so much of it in one location. And in the process, destroying the cooler

micro-climate that made the lots around the golf course such an attractive location to build and

live on in the first place.


Apparently there are at least two other options for removal of golf course turf that never

made their way to the City Council, much less to We the People of Boulder City. Why haven’t

we seen those? And why not have some real listening to and dialogue with the golf course

residents who will be impacted most before the city plunges forward with a project that will

ultimately be irreversible and irreparable?


There’s also a largely unnoticed aspect of the golf course turf removal project that I’m

astonished nobody is talking about. Specifically, the turf removal project also includes

replacement of the golf course’s irrigation system. So does that mean the city is now forever

abandoning the prospect of directly reusing our treated wastewater as a source for irrigating the

Muni Course? If we really want to conserve water, then how about the wasted 1 million to 1.5

million gallons of raw water that flows into Boulder City’s desert every day? That’s a project

that SNWA was recently willing to give Boulder City $26 million to accomplish. But if we’re

re-doing the golf course’s irrigation system now, then it seems like we’ve given up on the

wastewater re-use option. And worse yet, it seems like the City Council might be doing that

unknowingly because staff is glossing over rather than raising the issue.


Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for water conservation. But Nevada isn’t the problem,

domestic water use isn’t the problem, and golf courses and resorts aren’t the problem either. Our

state amounts to nothing more than a statistical rounding error in the river-wide problem, and

absolutely nothing Nevadans do to better conserve or recycle is going to change that. Even if we

completely wiped out the residential populations of Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico,

for instance, drying up millions or acres of turf and water features in the process, the lake would

still be dropping.


So, let’s get real when it comes to turf removal and be sensible about it. Some scaled-

back version of the golf course turf removal project might make sense. But the city should take a

deep breath, call a timeout, and fully vet the options before moving forward.


For any of my fellow citizens who feel like I do, I’m told by at least one staff member

that it’s not too late. One thing you can do to make your voice heard is take the survey found on

the city’s website at https://www.bcnv.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=410. More importantly,

though, you should contact City Council and staff members directly

(https://www.bcnv.org/159/City-Council) to insist that appropriate processes be followed so that

everyone has an opportunity to understand the issues, ask hard questions, have our voices heard,

and make a final decision with all of the relevant information at our disposal.


Hurry, though. Final design and construction documents are already in the works, with a

request for bids scheduled later this year and commencement of construction early next year. So,

if you wait much longer, your opportunity will forever be lost.


Komentarze


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
bottom of page